CFA Program — Asset Allocation

36 free practice questions with full explanations.

This is a sample. Create a free account for the full CFA Program Q-bank, timed mock exams, and daily practice.

Question 1

In the context of asset allocation, the concept of "corner portfolios" along the efficient frontier refers to:

A) Portfolios located at the extreme low-risk and high-risk ends of the frontier only
B) Portfolios at which the set of assets held changes as one moves along the efficient frontier, marking points where an asset either enters or exits the optimal mix
C) Portfolios with negative expected returns
D) Portfolios that ignore all constraints

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) Portfolios at which the set of assets held changes as one moves along the efficient frontier, marking points where an asset either enters or exits the optimal mix

Corner portfolios mark points along the constrained efficient frontier where the composition of assets held changes -- i.e., where an additional asset enters the optimal portfolio or an existing asset's weight goes to zero -- useful for characterizing how optimal allocations shift with risk tolerance.

Question 2

An investor's strategic asset allocation is being revisited due to a significant, durable shift in the investor's time horizon (e.g., approaching retirement). This is most appropriately classified as:

A) A tactical asset allocation adjustment
B) A rebalancing of the strategic asset allocation, since the investor's underlying objectives and constraints have genuinely and durably changed
C) A violation of the investment policy statement
D) An action that should never be taken regardless of client circumstances

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) A rebalancing of the strategic asset allocation, since the investor's underlying objectives and constraints have genuinely and durably changed

Strategic asset allocation should be revisited when an investor's fundamental objectives, constraints, or circumstances (such as time horizon) undergo a genuine, durable change -- distinct from tactical allocation shifts, which are short-term deviations based on near-term market views rather than a change in underlying investor circumstances.

Question 3

A risk parity asset allocation approach primarily allocates capital across asset classes based on:

A) Equal dollar amounts invested in each asset class
B) Equalizing each asset class's contribution to total portfolio risk, rather than equalizing dollar allocations
C) Historical average returns alone, with no regard to risk
D) Market capitalization weights exclusively

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) Equalizing each asset class's contribution to total portfolio risk, rather than equalizing dollar allocations

Risk parity allocates capital so that each asset class contributes roughly equally to total portfolio risk (often requiring leverage on lower-volatility assets like bonds), in contrast to naive equal-dollar-weighting, which typically leaves the portfolio dominated by the risk of the highest-volatility asset class.

Question 4

Resampled mean-variance optimization, as opposed to classical mean-variance optimization, primarily addresses which limitation?

A) The tendency of classical optimizers to produce extreme, highly concentrated, and estimation-error-sensitive allocations
B) The inability to incorporate any constraints at all
C) The fact that classical optimization cannot handle more than two asset classes
D) The requirement for negative expected returns as inputs

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: A) The tendency of classical optimizers to produce extreme, highly concentrated, and estimation-error-sensitive allocations

Classical mean-variance optimization is highly sensitive to small errors in input estimates (expected returns, variances, correlations), often producing extreme, concentrated, and unstable allocations; resampling techniques average results across many simulated input sets to produce more diversified, stable allocations.

Question 5

When incorporating human capital into an individual investor's overall asset allocation decision, an investor whose labor income closely resembles a bond (stable, low-risk) would most appropriately:

A) Reduce financial portfolio exposure to bonds and increase equity exposure, since human capital already provides bond-like diversification
B) Increase financial portfolio exposure to bonds to match human capital
C) Ignore human capital entirely in the allocation decision
D) Hold only cash in the financial portfolio

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: A) Reduce financial portfolio exposure to bonds and increase equity exposure, since human capital already provides bond-like diversification

When an investor's human capital behaves like a bond (stable and predictable, as with tenured employment), the overall portfolio (human capital + financial capital) is already tilted toward bond-like risk; the financial portfolio can then hold more equities to achieve the investor's desired overall risk exposure, since human capital substitutes for some fixed income allocation.

Question 6

A goals-based asset allocation approach, relative to a traditional mean-variance total-portfolio approach, is most distinguished by:

A) Allocating assets into sub-portfolios matched to specific client goals (e.g., a safety-focused reserve, a market-matching aspirational portfolio), each with its own risk/return profile
B) Ignoring the client's individual goals entirely in favor of a single optimized portfolio
C) Using identical portfolios for every client regardless of goals
D) Eliminating the need for any risk tolerance assessment

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: A) Allocating assets into sub-portfolios matched to specific client goals (e.g., a safety-focused reserve, a market-matching aspirational portfolio), each with its own risk/return profile

Goals-based investing segments a client's overall wealth into distinct sub-portfolios (or "buckets"), each aligned with a specific goal and its associated required probability of success, risk tolerance, and time horizon, rather than optimizing a single portfolio purely on mean-variance grounds.

Question 7

An institutional investor is developing strategic asset allocation using a mean-variance optimization approach but finds the resulting allocations highly sensitive to small changes in expected return assumptions, producing extreme, concentrated, and unintuitive portfolio weights. Which of the following approaches would most directly address this specific problem?

A) Reducing the investment horizon used in the optimization to a single day.
B) Using a resampling or Black-Litterman approach that either averages results over many resampled optimizations or anchors on market-implied equilibrium returns blended with specific views, both of which tend to produce more stable and diversified allocations.
C) Simply increasing the number of asset classes included in the optimization, regardless of the underlying input sensitivity issue.
D) Switching to a strategy that ignores expected returns entirely and allocates purely based on historical price levels.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) Using a resampling or Black-Litterman approach that either averages results over many resampled optimizations or anchors on market-implied equilibrium returns blended with specific views, both of which tend to produce more stable and diversified allocations.

Standard unconstrained mean-variance optimization is well known for extreme sensitivity to small changes in expected return inputs, often producing concentrated, unintuitive corner solutions; resampling techniques (averaging over many simulated optimizations) and the Black-Litterman model (anchoring on market equilibrium returns) are both specifically designed to address this instability.

Question 8

An asset owner is deciding between a strategic asset allocation approach based on a fixed set of target weights reviewed infrequently versus a dynamic, more frequently adjusted approach that shifts allocations based on changing market valuations and economic conditions. Which of the following is a valid consideration favoring the dynamic approach?

A) It can better respond to meaningful, persistent shifts in the investment opportunity set (such as valuation extremes or structural economic changes) that a rarely reviewed, static allocation might not capture in a timely manner.
B) The dynamic approach eliminates all implementation costs associated with more frequent portfolio adjustments.
C) A dynamic approach guarantees superior risk-adjusted returns compared to any static approach in every market environment.
D) Static allocations are always superior because they eliminate behavioral biases entirely.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: A) It can better respond to meaningful, persistent shifts in the investment opportunity set (such as valuation extremes or structural economic changes) that a rarely reviewed, static allocation might not capture in a timely manner.

A more dynamically managed strategic allocation can better respond to meaningful shifts in the investment opportunity set, such as valuation extremes or structural economic changes, that infrequent static reviews might miss for extended periods — though this must be weighed against the added complexity, cost, and risk of poorly timed tactical shifts if not executed with discipline.

Question 9

Which of the following best describes a key limitation of using historical correlations between asset classes as an input to strategic asset allocation, particularly during periods of severe market stress?

A) Using historical correlations eliminates all estimation error from the asset allocation process.
B) Correlations between risk assets have historically tended to rise sharply during market crises, meaning diversification benefits estimated from calmer historical periods can understate the co-movement (and thus overstate the diversification benefit) that materializes precisely when protection is most needed.
C) Historical correlations are always identical during both calm and stressed market periods, with no meaningful variation.
D) Correlation is not a relevant input to any form of portfolio construction.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) Correlations between risk assets have historically tended to rise sharply during market crises, meaning diversification benefits estimated from calmer historical periods can understate the co-movement (and thus overstate the diversification benefit) that materializes precisely when protection is most needed.

A well-documented phenomenon is that correlations among risk assets tend to increase during periods of market stress (sometimes called "correlation breakdown" of diversification benefits), meaning an allocation built on calmer-period historical correlations may understate how much asset classes will move together precisely during the crisis periods when diversification is most valued.

Question 10

An investor's strategic asset allocation includes a corridor (rebalancing range) around each asset class's target weight, wider for less liquid, higher-transaction-cost asset classes and narrower for highly liquid, low-cost asset classes. This calibration approach reflects a tradeoff between:

A) The asset class's expected return only, unrelated to any cost or liquidity considerations.
B) Regulatory requirements that mandate identical corridor widths for all asset classes.
C) The cost and disruption of rebalancing (favoring wider ranges for costly-to-trade asset classes) versus the risk of the portfolio drifting too far from its strategic target (favoring narrower ranges generally).
D) Historical volatility only, with transaction costs playing no role in setting corridor widths.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: C) The cost and disruption of rebalancing (favoring wider ranges for costly-to-trade asset classes) versus the risk of the portfolio drifting too far from its strategic target (favoring narrower ranges generally).

Setting rebalancing corridor widths involves balancing the cost, tax impact, and market disruption of frequent rebalancing against the risk of the portfolio's actual allocation drifting materially from its strategic target; wider corridors for costly-to-trade, illiquid asset classes reduce unnecessary trading, while narrower corridors for liquid, low-cost asset classes allow tighter tracking to target with minimal cost.

Question 11

A family office is considering using a risk-based (rather than asset-class-based) approach to strategic asset allocation, allocating capital across broad risk factors (such as equity risk, interest rate risk, and credit risk) instead of traditional asset class buckets. A key rationale for this approach is:

A) Risk-based allocation guarantees higher absolute returns than asset-class-based allocation in all market environments.
B) Risk factors are entirely uncorrelated with traditional asset classes by definition.
C) A risk-based approach eliminates the need for any capital market expectations.
D) Traditional asset classes often share significant exposure to common underlying risk factors, so a risk-factor-based approach can reveal that a portfolio is less diversified than its asset-class allocation alone would suggest.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: D) Traditional asset classes often share significant exposure to common underlying risk factors, so a risk-factor-based approach can reveal that a portfolio is less diversified than its asset-class allocation alone would suggest.

Because many traditional asset classes share exposure to common underlying risk factors (e.g., both equities and high-yield bonds carry meaningful exposure to economic growth/equity risk), a nominal asset-class allocation can mask concentrated risk factor exposure; a risk-factor-based approach is intended to reveal and manage this more directly.

Question 12

A pension fund employs a surplus optimization approach to strategic asset allocation, explicitly incorporating the fund's liabilities into the optimization process rather than optimizing assets alone. This approach is most appropriate when:

A) The fund's primary objective is managing the volatility of the funded status (assets relative to liabilities) rather than simply maximizing asset returns in isolation.
B) The fund has no defined liability stream of any kind to consider.
C) The fund's sole objective is maximizing absolute asset returns regardless of any liability considerations.
D) Surplus optimization can only be used for funds with a 100% funded status.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: A) The fund's primary objective is managing the volatility of the funded status (assets relative to liabilities) rather than simply maximizing asset returns in isolation.

Surplus optimization explicitly incorporates the liability stream into the optimization, making it most appropriate when the fund's key risk concern is the volatility of its funded status (the gap between assets and liabilities) rather than simply the volatility or level of asset returns considered on their own.

Question 13

A defined contribution retirement plan sponsor is selecting a default investment option, such as a target-date fund series, for participants who do not make an active investment election. Which of the following is a key strategic asset allocation consideration specific to a target-date fund's "glide path" design?

A) How the fund's asset allocation is systematically adjusted over time (typically becoming more conservative) as the target retirement date approaches, balancing growth needs earlier in the accumulation period against capital preservation needs closer to and during retirement.
B) Target-date funds maintain an identical, unchanging asset allocation throughout the entire life of the fund, regardless of the participant's age.
C) Glide path design has no relevance to the plan sponsor's fiduciary responsibilities in selecting a default option.
D) A target-date fund's glide path is determined solely by short-term market conditions rather than the participant's time horizon.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: A) How the fund's asset allocation is systematically adjusted over time (typically becoming more conservative) as the target retirement date approaches, balancing growth needs earlier in the accumulation period against capital preservation needs closer to and during retirement.

A target-date fund's glide path describes how its asset allocation systematically shifts over time, typically becoming more conservative as the target date approaches, reflecting the general principle that a longer remaining horizon can support greater risk-taking early on, while capital preservation becomes relatively more important closer to and during the retirement drawdown period; plan sponsors evaluating default options for a broad population of participants must weigh this design carefully given its fiduciary implications.

Question 14

A large institutional investor is comparing a strategic asset allocation approach based on traditional asset classes versus one based on an "asset-liability" framework that explicitly models the investor's liability stream. Which type of investor would most likely derive the greatest benefit from adopting the asset-liability framework?

A) Asset-liability frameworks provide identical benefit to every type of investor regardless of whether a defined liability stream exists.
B) A defined benefit pension plan or insurance company with a well-defined, long-dated stream of future obligations whose value is itself sensitive to interest rates and other market factors.
C) An individual investor saving for an undefined, flexible retirement date with no formal liability stream.
D) A sovereign wealth fund with no specific liability obligations and an indefinite investment horizon.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) A defined benefit pension plan or insurance company with a well-defined, long-dated stream of future obligations whose value is itself sensitive to interest rates and other market factors.

Asset-liability management frameworks are most valuable for investors with well-defined, often interest-rate-sensitive liability streams, such as defined benefit pension plans or insurance companies, since these frameworks explicitly account for how asset performance interacts with changes in the value of the investor's obligations, a consideration less relevant for investors without a formal liability stream to hedge against.

Question 15

An asset allocator constructing a strategic allocation for a taxable individual investor incorporates after-tax expected returns and after-tax risk into the optimization process, rather than using pre-tax capital market assumptions directly. Which of the following best describes the primary rationale for this adjustment?

A) Different asset classes and account structures can be taxed very differently, so an allocation optimized using pre-tax assumptions alone could lead to a suboptimal after-tax outcome, which is what ultimately matters to a taxable investor's actual wealth accumulation.
B) After-tax adjustments are irrelevant to any individual investor's asset allocation decision.
C) Pre-tax and after-tax expected returns are always identical for every asset class, making the adjustment unnecessary.
D) Tax considerations apply only to fixed income asset classes and never affect equity allocation decisions.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: A) Different asset classes and account structures can be taxed very differently, so an allocation optimized using pre-tax assumptions alone could lead to a suboptimal after-tax outcome, which is what ultimately matters to a taxable investor's actual wealth accumulation.

Because different asset classes (and the specific accounts holding them) can face very different effective tax treatment (e.g., qualified dividends versus ordinary income, tax-deferred versus taxable accounts), optimizing using pre-tax assumptions alone can lead to allocations that are suboptimal on an after-tax basis, which is the outcome that actually matters to a taxable investor's real wealth accumulation over time.

Question 16

A strategic asset allocation framework incorporates "time diversification," the idea that equity risk diminishes over sufficiently long holding periods. Which of the following is a valid critique of relying heavily on this concept when setting a long-horizon investor's strategic allocation?

A) Time diversification guarantees that equity investments can never experience a loss over any sufficiently long holding period.
B) The concept of time diversification has been universally and completely disproven with no remaining debate or nuance in the literature.
C) A long time horizon has no bearing whatsoever on the appropriate consideration of equity risk in strategic allocation.
D) While the annualized volatility of average returns may appear to decline over longer horizons, the potential dollar range of ending wealth outcomes (terminal wealth uncertainty) does not necessarily shrink, and may even widen, meaning the risk relevant to an investor's actual financial outcome is not simply eliminated by a long horizon.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: D) While the annualized volatility of average returns may appear to decline over longer horizons, the potential dollar range of ending wealth outcomes (terminal wealth uncertainty) does not necessarily shrink, and may even widen, meaning the risk relevant to an investor's actual financial outcome is not simply eliminated by a long horizon.

A key critique of relying too heavily on time diversification is the distinction between the annualized volatility of returns (which can appear to decline with a longer horizon under certain statistical assumptions) and the actual dollar-denominated terminal wealth uncertainty (which can remain substantial or even grow with a longer horizon), meaning the risk that matters most to an investor's actual financial outcome is not simply eliminated by extending the time horizon.

Question 17

A multi-asset investor incorporates an explicit view on the current economic regime (e.g., a "reflation" regime characterized by rising growth and rising inflation) into a scenario-weighted approach to setting near-term tactical tilts around the strategic asset allocation. Under a reflation regime, which of the following asset class tilts would most likely be favored, all else equal?

A) Economic regime considerations have no meaningful relationship to relative asset class performance under any circumstances.
B) A tilt entirely out of all growth-sensitive assets and into cash exclusively, regardless of the reflation regime's specific characteristics.
C) A tilt toward assets that have historically performed relatively well under both rising growth and rising inflation, such as certain commodities, real assets, and cyclical equities, relative to nominal long-duration government bonds.
D) A tilt heavily toward long-duration nominal government bonds, which typically benefit most from rising inflation.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: C) A tilt toward assets that have historically performed relatively well under both rising growth and rising inflation, such as certain commodities, real assets, and cyclical equities, relative to nominal long-duration government bonds.

A "reflation" regime, characterized by both rising growth and rising inflation, has historically tended to favor real assets, certain commodities, and cyclical equities, which can benefit from stronger nominal growth and provide some inflation protection, relative to nominal long-duration government bonds, which tend to underperform when inflation and, consequently, interest rates rise.

Question 18

An investor's strategic asset allocation policy specifies a maximum allowable allocation to any single alternative investment strategy or manager, distinct from the overall target weight for the alternative investments asset class as a whole. Which of the following best describes the primary rationale for this additional, manager-specific constraint?

A) Setting an overall asset-class target weight alone is always sufficient to fully manage all forms of concentration risk within that asset class.
B) Managing concentration risk and idiosyncratic manager-specific risk (such as key-person risk or operational failure at a single fund), which is not addressed simply by setting an appropriate overall asset-class-level target weight.
C) This type of constraint serves no meaningful risk management purpose and is purely a matter of administrative preference.
D) Manager-specific position limits are only relevant for traditional long-only public equity strategies, never for alternative investments.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) Managing concentration risk and idiosyncratic manager-specific risk (such as key-person risk or operational failure at a single fund), which is not addressed simply by setting an appropriate overall asset-class-level target weight.

While an overall asset-class target weight manages the portfolio's aggregate exposure to a broad category like alternative investments, a manager-specific position limit is needed to manage concentration and idiosyncratic risk at the level of an individual strategy or manager, such as key-person dependency or the risk of an operational failure at a single fund, which an aggregate asset-class-level constraint alone would not adequately address.

Question 19

The asset-only (AO) mean-variance optimization ignores which critical dimension for liability-aware investors?

A) Expected asset returns
B) The covariance of asset returns with the liabilities
C) The asset allocation constraints (minimum/maximum weights)
D) The risk-free rate

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) The covariance of asset returns with the liabilities

AO optimization minimizes portfolio variance for a given expected return without considering liabilities. For institutions with liabilities (pension funds, insurance companies), surplus optimization (assets − liabilities) is more appropriate, requiring the covariance between assets and liabilities.

Question 20

Factor-based strategic asset allocation (SAA) differs from traditional asset class-based SAA because:

A) Factor-based SAA uses only equities; class-based uses all asset classes
B) Factor-based SAA allocates to underlying economic risk factors (growth, inflation, rates) that drive asset class returns
C) Factor-based SAA requires quarterly rebalancing while class-based requires annual
D) Factor-based SAA eliminates the need for a benchmark

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) Factor-based SAA allocates to underlying economic risk factors (growth, inflation, rates) that drive asset class returns

Factor-based SAA (Bridgewater's risk parity, AQIM etc.) identifies the underlying macro risk factors driving asset returns and builds portfolios balanced across these factors — rather than traditional asset class labels that may mask true risk concentrations.

Question 21

An investor uses a mean-variance efficient frontier. The optimal risky portfolio is identified at the point where:

A) Expected return is maximized for any risk level
B) The capital allocation line is tangent to the efficient frontier (maximum Sharpe ratio)
C) The investor's indifference curve crosses the minimum variance portfolio
D) Expected return equals the risk-free rate

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) The capital allocation line is tangent to the efficient frontier (maximum Sharpe ratio)

The optimal risky portfolio (tangency portfolio) is where the CAL is tangent to the efficient frontier — it has the highest Sharpe ratio. All rational investors hold a combination of the risk-free asset and this tangency portfolio, differing only in allocation between the two.

Question 22

Rebalancing to a fixed strategic asset allocation creates a systematic tendency to:

A) Chase momentum by buying outperformers
B) Buy assets that have underperformed and sell those that have outperformed (contrarian)
C) Increase equity weight during bull markets
D) Reduce bond allocation during rising rate environments

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) Buy assets that have underperformed and sell those that have outperformed (contrarian)

Rebalancing buys the underperformers (to restore target weight) and sells the outperformers. It is inherently contrarian — the opposite of momentum. Evidence suggests it provides a small but consistent rebalancing bonus over time.

Question 23

The risk parity approach to asset allocation weights assets so that:

A) All assets have equal dollar allocations
B) Each asset contributes equally to total portfolio risk
C) The portfolio is on the efficient frontier at the maximum Sharpe ratio
D) The portfolio replicates the market-cap weighted index

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) Each asset contributes equally to total portfolio risk

Risk parity equalizes each asset's marginal contribution to total portfolio risk (not dollar weight or expected return contribution). This typically results in higher allocations to lower-volatility assets (bonds) and may use leverage to achieve return targets.

Question 24

A sovereign wealth fund with a 30-year time horizon and no immediate liquidity needs should most likely have which strategic asset allocation?

A) 90% short-duration bonds and 10% equities to preserve capital
B) A diversified allocation with significant real assets and equities for long-term real return
C) 100% cash equivalents pending better market opportunities
D) Equal weights across all asset classes for simplicity

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) A diversified allocation with significant real assets and equities for long-term real return

A 30-year horizon with no near-term liquidity requirement allows for substantial illiquidity premium and equity risk premium capture. Real assets provide inflation protection. Shorter-duration bonds are inappropriate for a long-horizon fund.

Question 25

A pension fund with significant liabilities uses "surplus optimization" rather than traditional asset-only mean-variance optimization. This approach explicitly incorporates:

A) The fund's liabilities, but only in terms of total dollar amount, with no consideration of how they move relative to assets.
B) A method used exclusively for individual investors, never for institutions.
C) The correlation between asset returns and changes in the value of the fund's liabilities, aiming to optimize the funded surplus (assets minus liabilities) rather than assets alone.
D) Only the expected returns of the assets, with no consideration of liabilities whatsoever.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: C) The correlation between asset returns and changes in the value of the fund's liabilities, aiming to optimize the funded surplus (assets minus liabilities) rather than assets alone.

Surplus optimization explicitly models the relationship (correlation) between asset returns and liability value changes, seeking to optimize the fund's surplus (assets minus the present value of liabilities) rather than simply maximizing asset returns for a given level of asset risk, which is particularly important for liability-driven institutional investors like pension funds.

Question 26

The "resampled efficient frontier" approach to asset allocation is designed primarily to address which limitation of traditional mean-variance optimization?

A) The complete absence of any need for expected return estimates.
B) The sensitivity of mean-variance optimization to small errors or uncertainty in the estimated inputs (expected returns, variances, and covariances), which can lead to extreme, unstable, or unintuitive portfolio weights.
C) The inability of mean-variance optimization to consider more than two asset classes.
D) The requirement that all asset classes have identical expected returns.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) The sensitivity of mean-variance optimization to small errors or uncertainty in the estimated inputs (expected returns, variances, and covariances), which can lead to extreme, unstable, or unintuitive portfolio weights.

Traditional mean-variance optimization is highly sensitive to estimation error in its inputs, often producing extreme or unstable allocations from small input changes. Resampling techniques address this by simulating many possible sets of inputs (based on estimation uncertainty) and averaging the resulting optimal portfolios, generally producing more diversified and stable allocations.

Question 27

The Black-Litterman model for asset allocation combines:

A) A market equilibrium starting point (implied expected returns derived from market capitalization weights) with an investor's own specific views, blending the two into a set of adjusted expected returns.
B) Only historical average returns, with no consideration of current market prices at all.
C) A random number generator with no relationship to actual market data.
D) A method that requires the investor to have no views whatsoever on any asset class.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: A) A market equilibrium starting point (implied expected returns derived from market capitalization weights) with an investor's own specific views, blending the two into a set of adjusted expected returns.

The Black-Litterman model starts from the expected returns implied by current market equilibrium (reverse-optimized from market-cap weights), then blends in the investor's specific views (with a specified confidence level for each view), producing a set of adjusted expected returns that tend to be more intuitive and less extreme than using an investor's raw views alone in a traditional optimizer.

Question 28

A "risk parity" asset allocation approach constructs a portfolio such that:

A) Every asset class receives an identical dollar allocation, regardless of its volatility.
B) Only the least volatile asset class is included in the portfolio.
C) Risk parity portfolios never use any leverage under any circumstances.
D) Each asset class or portfolio component contributes approximately equally to the portfolio's total risk, rather than equally to the portfolio's dollar allocation.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: D) Each asset class or portfolio component contributes approximately equally to the portfolio's total risk, rather than equally to the portfolio's dollar allocation.

Risk parity allocates capital so that each component contributes roughly equally to total portfolio risk (rather than equal dollar weights), which often requires leveraging lower-risk asset classes (such as bonds) to bring their risk contribution up to parity with historically higher-risk asset classes like equities.

Question 29

A "goals-based" wealth management approach to asset allocation for an individual investor typically involves:

A) Ignoring the client's stated goals entirely in favor of a purely market-driven allocation.
B) Applying the exact same time horizon to every one of the client's goals.
C) Constructing separate sub-portfolios, each tailored to a specific client goal (such as retirement income, education funding, or a legacy bequest) with its own time horizon and risk profile, rather than a single integrated portfolio.
D) A single portfolio with an identical asset allocation regardless of the client's specific goals.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: C) Constructing separate sub-portfolios, each tailored to a specific client goal (such as retirement income, education funding, or a legacy bequest) with its own time horizon and risk profile, rather than a single integrated portfolio.

Goals-based investing segments a client's total wealth into distinct sub-portfolios aligned with specific goals, each with its own appropriate time horizon, risk tolerance, and required probability of success, reflecting the reality that different goals often warrant meaningfully different investment approaches, even within the same client's total wealth.

Question 30

When constructing a strategic asset allocation for an institutional investor, capital market expectations (CME) for expected returns, volatilities, and correlations are typically derived using which general approach, among others?

A) A method that assumes all asset classes will have identical future returns.
B) A combination of historical statistical analysis, economic and fundamental analysis (such as a building-block approach), and survey- or judgment-based methods.
C) Exclusively random number generation with no analytical basis.
D) A method that requires no consideration of historical data whatsoever.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) A combination of historical statistical analysis, economic and fundamental analysis (such as a building-block approach), and survey- or judgment-based methods.

Capital market expectations are typically formed using a combination of approaches, including historical statistical analysis (extrapolating from past data, with appropriate caution), economic and fundamental analysis (such as building-block approaches that decompose expected returns into components like real risk-free rate, inflation, and risk premia), and expert judgment or survey-based methods, often triangulating across multiple approaches.

Question 31

An investor's strategic asset allocation targets a 60% equity / 40% fixed income mix, with a rebalancing corridor of +/-5 percentage points around each target weight. At the most recent review, equities have risen to represent 66% of the portfolio and fixed income has fallen to 34%. Under a calendar-and-corridor rebalancing approach using this corridor rule, the fund should most appropriately:

A) Take no rebalancing action, since a 6 percentage point drift is still considered immaterial for any calendar-and-corridor policy.
B) Rebalance by selling equities and buying fixed income to move the portfolio back toward (though not necessarily exactly to) the 60/40 target, since the equity weight has breached its +5 percentage point corridor boundary of 65%.
C) Rebalance by buying additional equities, since the asset class that has risen in value is presumed to have superior forward-looking expected returns.
D) Liquidate the entire fixed income allocation and shift fully into equities, since the corridor breach signals a permanent change in the appropriate strategic allocation.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) Rebalance by selling equities and buying fixed income to move the portfolio back toward (though not necessarily exactly to) the 60/40 target, since the equity weight has breached its +5 percentage point corridor boundary of 65%.

With a 60% target and a +/-5 percentage point corridor, the equity weight's upper rebalancing boundary is 65%; since the actual equity weight of 66% has breached this boundary, a corridor-based rebalancing policy would trigger a trade back toward the target range by selling equities and buying fixed income, rather than taking no action, chasing the outperforming asset class, or treating the breach as a signal to abandon the strategic allocation altogether.

Question 32

A family office with a very long time horizon and no near-term liquidity needs is comparing two strategic allocations with identical expected returns: Allocation X has an expected annual standard deviation of 12% with a maximum historical peak-to-trough drawdown of 35%, while Allocation Y has an expected annual standard deviation of 12% with a maximum historical peak-to-trough drawdown of 18%, driven by meaningfully different underlying return distribution shapes (skewness and kurtosis). For this specific investor, which of the following is the most appropriate conclusion?

A) Because both allocations have identical standard deviation, they are necessarily equally appropriate for this investor, with no other consideration relevant to the allocation decision.
B) Despite having identical standard deviation, Allocation Y's meaningfully smaller historical maximum drawdown suggests a less severe left-tail (downside) risk profile, a consideration relevant even for a long-horizon investor, since large drawdowns can still create behavioral or practical challenges (such as pressure to abandon the strategy) beyond what standard deviation alone captures.
C) Standard deviation is the only risk measure ever relevant to strategic asset allocation, making drawdown history irrelevant regardless of the investor's specific circumstances.
D) Allocation X should always be preferred over Allocation Y, since a larger historical drawdown is definitionally evidence of a superior long-term risk premium.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) Despite having identical standard deviation, Allocation Y's meaningfully smaller historical maximum drawdown suggests a less severe left-tail (downside) risk profile, a consideration relevant even for a long-horizon investor, since large drawdowns can still create behavioral or practical challenges (such as pressure to abandon the strategy) beyond what standard deviation alone captures.

Because standard deviation treats all deviations from the mean symmetrically, two allocations can share an identical standard deviation while differing meaningfully in tail risk characteristics, as reflected here by Allocation X's much larger maximum drawdown; even for a long-horizon investor without near-term liquidity needs, a more severe drawdown history is a relevant consideration, since large drawdowns can create substantial behavioral pressure to abandon a strategy at an inopportune time, a risk not fully captured by standard deviation alone.

Question 33

A $500 million endowment currently allocates 25% to private equity. The investment committee is evaluating whether this allocation is sustainable given the fund's expected future capital calls and distributions from its existing private equity commitments, using a cash flow pacing model. Which of the following inputs is most critical to this pacing analysis?

A) Only the fund's total current market value, since pacing models require no information about the private equity portfolio's own expected cash flow timing.
B) The expected timing and magnitude of future capital calls and distributions across the existing portfolio of private equity commitments at different vintage years and stages of maturity, together with assumptions about the pace of new commitments needed to maintain (or adjust) the target allocation over time.
C) Only the historical average return of the public equity market over the past decade, since private equity cash flows are assumed to mirror public equity market cash flows exactly.
D) The fund's spending policy rate exclusively, with no consideration of the private equity portfolio's own capital call and distribution schedule.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) The expected timing and magnitude of future capital calls and distributions across the existing portfolio of private equity commitments at different vintage years and stages of maturity, together with assumptions about the pace of new commitments needed to maintain (or adjust) the target allocation over time.

A private equity cash flow pacing model requires projecting the expected timing and magnitude of both capital calls (cash outflows as commitments are drawn down) and distributions (cash inflows as investments are realized) across the existing portfolio of commitments at various vintage years and stages of maturity, combined with assumptions about the pace of new annual commitments needed to reach or maintain the fund's target private equity allocation over time; this is considerably more nuanced than relying solely on total fund size, public market historical returns, or the spending policy alone.

Question 34

An investment committee is comparing mean-variance optimization (MVO) to a resampled (Monte Carlo simulation-based) efficient frontier approach for setting strategic asset allocation weights. Which of the following best describes a key motivation for using the resampled approach instead of standard MVO?

A) Resampled optimization is motivated by a desire to produce allocations that are less sensitive to small estimation errors in the input capital market assumptions, since standard MVO is well known to be highly sensitive to small changes in expected return, volatility, and correlation inputs, often producing extreme, concentrated, and unstable weightings.
B) Resampled optimization eliminates the need for any capital market assumptions whatsoever, relying entirely on qualitative judgment.
C) Standard MVO is universally robust to estimation error in its inputs, making resampling entirely unnecessary in practice.
D) Resampled optimization guarantees a strictly higher realized return than standard MVO in every subsequent period, regardless of market conditions.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: A) Resampled optimization is motivated by a desire to produce allocations that are less sensitive to small estimation errors in the input capital market assumptions, since standard MVO is well known to be highly sensitive to small changes in expected return, volatility, and correlation inputs, often producing extreme, concentrated, and unstable weightings.

A well-documented weakness of standard mean-variance optimization is its high sensitivity to estimation error in the input capital market assumptions, small changes in expected returns, volatilities, or correlations can produce dramatically different, often extreme and concentrated, "optimal" portfolios; resampled (simulation-based) optimization techniques are motivated by a desire to produce more diversified, stable allocations that are less sensitive to this input estimation error, not by eliminating the need for capital market assumptions or guaranteeing superior realized performance.

Question 35

A sovereign wealth fund's strategic asset allocation incorporates a formal analysis of its "risk factor" exposures (equity risk, real rate risk, inflation risk, credit risk, liquidity risk) alongside the traditional asset-class-based allocation. Which of the following best describes a key advantage of this factor-based lens when the fund is evaluating a new allocation to a real estate debt strategy?

A) Factor-based analysis provides no incremental insight beyond the traditional asset-class allocation for any type of investment, including real estate debt.
B) It can reveal that the real estate debt strategy's risk exposures substantially overlap with risk factors the fund already holds through other allocations (such as credit risk from corporate bonds and equity-like risk from real estate equity), informing a more accurate assessment of the strategy's true marginal diversification benefit than treating it as an entirely distinct asset class would suggest.
C) Factor-based analysis eliminates the need to consider the fund's existing asset-class-level allocation entirely.
D) Real estate debt is definitionally free of both credit risk and real rate risk, making factor decomposition irrelevant to evaluating this specific strategy.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) It can reveal that the real estate debt strategy's risk exposures substantially overlap with risk factors the fund already holds through other allocations (such as credit risk from corporate bonds and equity-like risk from real estate equity), informing a more accurate assessment of the strategy's true marginal diversification benefit than treating it as an entirely distinct asset class would suggest.

A risk-factor-based lens looks through an asset class's label to its underlying economic risk exposures; for a strategy like real estate debt, this can reveal substantial overlap with credit risk (already present via corporate bond holdings) and real-asset/equity-like risk (already present via real estate equity), providing a more accurate picture of the strategy's true marginal diversification benefit to the total fund than evaluating it purely as a new, distinct asset-class bucket would suggest.

Question 36

A defined benefit plan with a funding ratio (assets divided by the present value of liabilities) of 0.82 is evaluating its strategic asset allocation. Relative to an otherwise identical plan with a funding ratio of 1.15, the underfunded plan's sponsor would most likely face which distinct consideration in setting the return-seeking allocation?

A) The underfunded plan faces no meaningfully different consideration, since funding ratio is irrelevant to strategic asset allocation decisions.
B) The underfunded plan should automatically adopt the identical allocation as the well-funded plan, since funding status has no bearing on appropriate risk-taking.
C) The underfunded plan faces a tension between needing higher expected returns to help close the funding gap over time and the risk that additional investment risk-taking could cause the funding ratio to deteriorate further if markets underperform, a risk/return tradeoff less pressing for the well-funded plan.
D) The underfunded plan should immediately move to a 100% liability-matching (fully immunized) allocation, since any funding ratio below 1.0 mandates full de-risking regardless of sponsor risk tolerance.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: C) The underfunded plan faces a tension between needing higher expected returns to help close the funding gap over time and the risk that additional investment risk-taking could cause the funding ratio to deteriorate further if markets underperform, a risk/return tradeoff less pressing for the well-funded plan.

A plan with a funding ratio below 1.0 faces a genuine tension: pursuing higher-returning, riskier assets offers a path to help close the funding gap, but also increases the risk that poor market outcomes could widen the shortfall further; a well-funded plan (funding ratio of 1.15) has comparatively less need to take on this risk to meet its obligations and can more readily prioritize preserving its funded status through a more conservative or liability-matching-oriented allocation, illustrating how funding ratio meaningfully informs (without single-handedly dictating) the appropriate asset allocation.

Want more Asset Allocation practice?

Create a free account to unlock the full CFA Program Q-bank and timed mock exams — no card required.

Create free account