Free practice questions/CFA Program

CFA ProgramEquity Portfolio Management

36 free practice questions with full explanations.

This is a sample. Create a free account for the full CFA Program Q-bank, timed mock exams, and daily practice.

Start free

Question 1

A completeness fund is most commonly used in an equity portfolio structure to:

  • A) Replace all actively managed sub-portfolios with a single passive fund
  • B) Fill in factor, sector, or style exposures unintentionally left out or overweighted by a combination of active managers, so the aggregate portfolio's exposures align with the overall policy benchmark
  • C) Eliminate the need for a policy benchmark entirely
  • D) Guarantee outperformance versus all underlying active managers
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) Fill in factor, sector, or style exposures unintentionally left out or overweighted by a combination of active managers, so the aggregate portfolio's exposures align with the overall policy benchmark

A completeness fund is designed to offset unintended aggregate exposures (e.g., sector, style, or factor tilts) that arise from combining multiple active managers, helping ensure the overall equity allocation's risk exposures remain aligned with the intended policy benchmark.

Question 2

A concentrated, high-conviction active equity manager with a low number of holdings and high active share relative to the benchmark would, all else equal, be expected to exhibit:

  • A) Very low tracking error relative to the benchmark
  • B) Higher tracking error relative to the benchmark, reflecting the concentrated portfolio's greater potential divergence in performance from the index
  • C) Performance that is always identical to the benchmark
  • D) Zero active risk by construction
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) Higher tracking error relative to the benchmark, reflecting the concentrated portfolio's greater potential divergence in performance from the index

A concentrated portfolio with high active share (few holdings, significant deviation from benchmark weights) is structurally more likely to produce returns that diverge meaningfully from the benchmark, resulting in higher tracking error than a more broadly diversified, benchmark-hugging portfolio.

Question 3

In equity portfolio construction, "implementation shortfall" measures:

  • A) The difference between a portfolio's paper (decision-price) return and its actual realized return after accounting for trading costs, market impact, and delay
  • B) The dividend yield shortfall relative to the benchmark
  • C) The number of securities excluded from the benchmark
  • D) The manager's fee relative to peers
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: A) The difference between a portfolio's paper (decision-price) return and its actual realized return after accounting for trading costs, market impact, and delay

Implementation shortfall captures the total cost of translating an investment decision into an actual executed position -- the gap between the theoretical "paper portfolio" return (at the decision price) and the actual portfolio's realized return, reflecting commissions, market impact, and delay/timing costs.

Question 4

An equity index manager uses a stratified sampling approach to replicate a broad benchmark rather than full replication. This approach is most likely chosen when:

  • A) The benchmark has very few constituent securities, all highly liquid
  • B) The benchmark contains a very large number of securities, some with limited liquidity, making full replication costly, so the manager instead selects a representative subset matching the benchmark's key characteristics
  • C) The manager wants to take large, unconstrained active bets against the benchmark
  • D) Transaction costs are irrelevant to the manager's decision
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) The benchmark contains a very large number of securities, some with limited liquidity, making full replication costly, so the manager instead selects a representative subset matching the benchmark's key characteristics

Stratified sampling (or optimization-based sampling) is typically used for indexing broad benchmarks with a large number of constituents, particularly when some are illiquid or costly to trade, allowing the manager to closely track the benchmark's risk/return characteristics using a smaller, more cost-efficient subset of securities.

Question 5

An equity manager benchmarked against a broad-market-cap-weighted index chooses to overweight small-cap value stocks based on a strong factor conviction, resulting in a portfolio that deviates meaningfully in style from the benchmark. This positioning is best described as a:

  • A) Passive indexing strategy
  • B) Style/factor tilt (active bet) relative to the benchmark
  • C) Perfect replication of the benchmark
  • D) Strategy with zero active risk
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) Style/factor tilt (active bet) relative to the benchmark

Deliberately overweighting a specific style or factor (e.g., small-cap value) relative to a broad benchmark represents an active bet -- a style/factor tilt -- that introduces active risk (tracking error) and reflects a conviction-based deviation from the benchmark's composition.

Question 6

An equity manager pursuing a market-neutral long/short strategy constructs the portfolio so that:

  • A) The portfolio has substantial net long market exposure (positive beta)
  • B) Long and short positions are sized so that the portfolio's net market exposure (beta) is approximately zero, aiming to isolate stock-specific (alpha) return rather than broad market direction
  • C) Only long positions are held, with no shorting
  • D) The portfolio's return is entirely determined by the direction of the overall market
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) Long and short positions are sized so that the portfolio's net market exposure (beta) is approximately zero, aiming to isolate stock-specific (alpha) return rather than broad market direction

A market-neutral long/short equity strategy sizes long and short positions so that the portfolio's net beta (market exposure) is approximately zero, seeking to generate returns primarily from stock selection (alpha) rather than from the direction of the overall equity market.

Question 7

An institutional investor is comparing a full-replication passive equity indexing approach against a stratified sampling approach for a broad, highly diversified equity index containing thousands of constituents, many with very small weights. Which of the following is a valid rationale for preferring stratified sampling in this case?

  • A) Full replication is impossible for any index containing more than 100 constituents.
  • B) Stratified sampling eliminates the need to consider the index's risk characteristics at all.
  • C) It can reduce transaction costs and the operational burden of trading and holding the smallest, least liquid constituent positions, while still closely tracking the index by matching key risk characteristics, accepting a modest increase in tracking error.
  • D) Stratified sampling always produces zero tracking error relative to the benchmark, superior to full replication.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: C) It can reduce transaction costs and the operational burden of trading and holding the smallest, least liquid constituent positions, while still closely tracking the index by matching key risk characteristics, accepting a modest increase in tracking error.

For very broad indices with many small, illiquid constituent positions, full replication can involve meaningful transaction costs and operational complexity for little tracking benefit; stratified sampling accepts a modest increase in tracking error in exchange for lower costs and complexity, by matching the index's key risk characteristics using a representative subset of holdings.

Question 8

A global equity portfolio manager is deciding between organizing the portfolio's active positions primarily around countries/regions versus primarily around global industry sectors. Which of the following considerations would most favor a sector-based organizing framework?

  • A) The relative importance of country versus sector effects never changes over time or across market environments.
  • B) The manager believes that, in the current market environment, industry- and company-specific factors are driving relative stock performance more than country-specific macroeconomic factors, a pattern sometimes associated with periods of increased global economic integration.
  • C) Country-specific factors always dominate industry-specific factors in every market environment without exception.
  • D) A sector-based framework is only applicable to domestic, single-country equity portfolios.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) The manager believes that, in the current market environment, industry- and company-specific factors are driving relative stock performance more than country-specific macroeconomic factors, a pattern sometimes associated with periods of increased global economic integration.

The relative importance of country-specific versus global sector-specific factors in driving stock returns can shift over time and across market environments; when industry- and company-specific factors are believed to dominate (a pattern often associated with periods of greater global economic integration), organizing active positioning around global sectors rather than countries can be more effective.

Question 9

An equity manager is evaluating the tradeoffs between concentrated, high-conviction stock-picking versus a more broadly diversified active equity portfolio, both benchmarked against the same index. Which of the following is a valid consideration favoring the more concentrated approach?

  • A) Concentration eliminates the possibility of any individual stock-specific risk affecting the portfolio.
  • B) A more diversified portfolio can never outperform a concentrated portfolio under any circumstances.
  • C) It allows the manager's highest-conviction ideas to have a more meaningful impact on overall portfolio performance, potentially increasing the portfolio's information ratio if the manager's skill (information coefficient) is genuinely higher for those specific ideas.
  • D) Concentration always guarantees lower portfolio volatility than a more diversified approach.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: C) It allows the manager's highest-conviction ideas to have a more meaningful impact on overall portfolio performance, potentially increasing the portfolio's information ratio if the manager's skill (information coefficient) is genuinely higher for those specific ideas.

The fundamental law of active management suggests that a manager's value-added (information ratio) depends on both the manager's skill (information coefficient) and the breadth of independent bets; a concentrated portfolio focused on a manager's highest-conviction ideas can increase the potential impact of genuine skill, though it also increases idiosyncratic (stock-specific) risk relative to a more diversified approach.

Question 10

An equity portfolio manager benchmarked against a broad market-cap-weighted index is evaluating whether to tilt the portfolio toward a specific style factor. Which of the following would most likely support a decision to tilt toward the low-volatility factor?

  • A) A belief that low-volatility stocks always generate the highest absolute (not risk-adjusted) returns in every market environment.
  • B) A belief that volatility has no relationship whatsoever to expected equity returns under any theoretical framework.
  • C) A mandate that explicitly prohibits any deviation from market-cap weights.
  • D) A belief that low-volatility stocks have historically delivered attractive risk-adjusted returns relative to their level of risk, potentially due to behavioral biases (such as a preference for lottery-like, high-volatility stocks) that cause low-volatility stocks to be systematically underpriced relative to their risk.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: D) A belief that low-volatility stocks have historically delivered attractive risk-adjusted returns relative to their level of risk, potentially due to behavioral biases (such as a preference for lottery-like, high-volatility stocks) that cause low-volatility stocks to be systematically underpriced relative to their risk.

The low-volatility factor's historical appeal is often attributed to behavioral explanations, such as investor preference for higher-volatility, "lottery-like" stocks, which can cause lower-volatility stocks to be relatively underpriced given their risk, contributing to attractive risk-adjusted (though not necessarily the highest absolute) returns over time.

Question 11

A quantitative equity manager constructs a portfolio using a multi-factor model incorporating value, quality, and momentum factors. During a period when value and momentum factors move in opposite directions from what is typically observed historically, the manager's realized portfolio risk is most likely to:

  • A) Differ from the model's predicted risk, since the model's risk estimates are based on historical relationships (including factor correlations) that may not hold during atypical periods, a form of model risk.
  • B) Exactly match the model's predicted risk in all cases, since factor models are always perfectly accurate regardless of market conditions.
  • C) Become identically zero, since factor-based diversification always eliminates all portfolio risk.
  • D) Be entirely unrelated to the behavior of the underlying value and momentum factors.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: A) Differ from the model's predicted risk, since the model's risk estimates are based on historical relationships (including factor correlations) that may not hold during atypical periods, a form of model risk.

Quantitative factor models rely on historically estimated relationships, including factor correlations; when factors behave atypically relative to their historical patterns, realized portfolio risk can differ meaningfully from what the model predicted, illustrating a key source of model risk in quantitative equity management.

Question 12

An active equity manager's portfolio construction process explicitly targets a specific level of active share and tracking error relative to its benchmark. Which of the following best describes the distinction between these two measures?

  • A) A portfolio with zero active share must necessarily have high tracking error.
  • B) Active share measures the percentage of portfolio holdings that differ from the benchmark's holdings, while tracking error measures the volatility of the difference between the portfolio's and benchmark's returns over time; a portfolio can have high active share but relatively low tracking error if its off-benchmark bets are individually small or offsetting.
  • C) Active share and tracking error are two different names for the exact same underlying calculation.
  • D) Tracking error measures portfolio holdings overlap, while active share measures return volatility.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) Active share measures the percentage of portfolio holdings that differ from the benchmark's holdings, while tracking error measures the volatility of the difference between the portfolio's and benchmark's returns over time; a portfolio can have high active share but relatively low tracking error if its off-benchmark bets are individually small or offsetting.

Active share and tracking error capture different dimensions of active management: active share is a holdings-based measure of how much the portfolio's composition differs from the benchmark, while tracking error is a returns-based measure of realized volatility of relative performance; the two can diverge, for example when many small, individually low-risk off-benchmark positions are held (high active share, potentially lower tracking error).

Question 13

An equity manager is evaluating the tradeoffs of implementing a systematic covered call writing strategy (selling call options against a long equity position) as a means of generating additional portfolio income. Which of the following is a key tradeoff of this strategy?

  • A) This strategy eliminates all downside risk associated with the underlying long equity position.
  • B) Covered call writing always outperforms a simple long-only equity position regardless of market direction.
  • C) It generates additional income from option premiums but caps the portfolio's potential upside beyond the option's strike price, meaning the strategy will underperform a simple long equity position during periods of strong market appreciation.
  • D) Covered call writing has no effect on the portfolio's potential upside participation in any market environment.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: C) It generates additional income from option premiums but caps the portfolio's potential upside beyond the option's strike price, meaning the strategy will underperform a simple long equity position during periods of strong market appreciation.

A systematic covered call strategy generates additional income from the option premiums received, but in exchange caps the portfolio's potential upside beyond the option's strike price (since the underlying shares would be called away or the gain otherwise forfeited above that level), meaning the strategy will tend to underperform a simple long-only equity position during periods of strong market appreciation, in exchange for enhanced income and modestly reduced downside during flat or moderately declining markets.

Question 14

An equity portfolio manager benchmarked against a broad domestic equity index is evaluating a shift from a market-capitalization-weighted approach to a fundamentally weighted approach (weighting constituents by measures such as revenue, earnings, or book value rather than market capitalization). Which of the following best describes a key rationale for this shift?

  • A) Fundamentally weighted indices always guarantee higher returns than market-cap-weighted indices in every market environment.
  • B) Fundamental weighting eliminates all forms of tracking error relative to a market-cap-weighted benchmark.
  • C) Market-capitalization weighting and fundamental weighting produce mathematically identical portfolio compositions.
  • D) Fundamental weighting can reduce the structural tendency of market-cap weighting to systematically overweight securities that have become relatively overvalued (and underweight those that have become relatively undervalued) purely due to price appreciation or decline.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: D) Fundamental weighting can reduce the structural tendency of market-cap weighting to systematically overweight securities that have become relatively overvalued (and underweight those that have become relatively undervalued) purely due to price appreciation or decline.

Because market-capitalization weighting mechanically increases a security's portfolio weight as its price rises (and decreases it as price falls), it can structurally overweight securities that have become relatively expensive and underweight those that have become relatively cheap; fundamental weighting, which bases weights on measures like revenue or book value rather than price, is designed to avoid this specific structural tendency, though it introduces its own tracking error and factor tilts (often toward value) relative to the market-cap benchmark.

Question 15

An equity manager's portfolio construction process explicitly considers "factor crowding" risk when adding a new position that scores highly on a popular value factor. Which of the following best describes a concern associated with factor crowding?

  • A) Factor crowding has no relationship to the potential severity or speed of a factor-related market drawdown.
  • B) Crowding concerns apply only to momentum-based factors and never to value-based factors.
  • C) If a large number of market participants hold similar positions based on the same popular factor signal, a sudden shift in sentiment or a factor-specific shock could trigger a rapid, correlated unwinding of these crowded positions, amplifying losses beyond what the factor's standalone historical risk profile might suggest.
  • D) Factor crowding guarantees superior returns for all investors holding the crowded factor exposure.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: C) If a large number of market participants hold similar positions based on the same popular factor signal, a sudden shift in sentiment or a factor-specific shock could trigger a rapid, correlated unwinding of these crowded positions, amplifying losses beyond what the factor's standalone historical risk profile might suggest.

When a specific factor exposure becomes "crowded" (widely held by many market participants pursuing similar strategies), a shift in sentiment, liquidity conditions, or a factor-specific shock can trigger a rapid, correlated unwinding across many holders simultaneously, potentially amplifying losses and volatility beyond what the factor's standalone historical risk characteristics would suggest, a risk not limited to any single factor category.

Question 16

An institutional investor selecting a passive equity index provider considers differences in index construction methodology, including rules around free-float adjustment (weighting constituents based on shares available for public trading rather than total shares outstanding). Which of the following best describes the primary purpose of free-float adjustment?

  • A) This adjustment applies only to fixed income indices and has no relevance to equity index construction.
  • B) Better reflecting the actual investable market capitalization available to typical investors, by excluding shares held by controlling shareholders, governments, or other strategic holders that are unlikely to trade in the open market.
  • C) Free-float adjustment is designed to maximize the weight given to shares held by controlling or strategic shareholders.
  • D) Free-float adjustment has no relationship to the practical investability of an index for typical market participants.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) Better reflecting the actual investable market capitalization available to typical investors, by excluding shares held by controlling shareholders, governments, or other strategic holders that are unlikely to trade in the open market.

Free-float adjustment weights index constituents based on the portion of shares actually available for public trading, excluding shares held by controlling shareholders, government entities, or other strategic holders unlikely to be traded, which helps ensure the index better reflects the investable opportunity set actually available to typical market participants, improving the practical replicability of the index for passive investment vehicles.

Question 17

An equity manager running a systematic, model-driven strategy periodically reviews and retrains the underlying model using updated data. Which of the following is a key risk associated with excessively frequent model retraining or overfitting to recent data?

  • A) The model may begin to fit noise or idiosyncratic patterns specific to the recent data sample rather than capturing genuine, persistent, and economically sensible relationships, potentially degrading true out-of-sample forecasting performance.
  • B) Frequent retraining always improves a model's genuine out-of-sample forecasting performance with no offsetting risk.
  • C) Overfitting is a concern only for discretionary, non-quantitative investment strategies, never for systematic models.
  • D) Model retraining has no relationship to the model's subsequent real-world performance.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: A) The model may begin to fit noise or idiosyncratic patterns specific to the recent data sample rather than capturing genuine, persistent, and economically sensible relationships, potentially degrading true out-of-sample forecasting performance.

Excessively frequent retraining, or fitting a model too closely to a specific, relatively short recent data sample, risks the model capturing noise or idiosyncratic patterns specific to that sample rather than genuine, persistent, and economically sensible relationships, a phenomenon known as overfitting, which can degrade the model's true forecasting performance on new, out-of-sample data even if it appears to fit historical data very well.

Question 18

An equity portfolio manager benchmarked against a growth-style index is evaluating whether the benchmark's current index construction methodology (which uses several fundamental characteristics to classify constituents as growth versus value) adequately reflects the manager's own investment philosophy. Which of the following is a valid consideration in this evaluation?

  • A) All style index providers use mathematically identical methodologies, producing identical growth and value constituent lists in every case.
  • B) Style index construction methodology has no relevance to whether a specific benchmark is appropriate for evaluating a given manager.
  • C) Growth and value style classifications are static and permanently fixed for each individual security, never subject to periodic reclassification.
  • D) Different index providers can use meaningfully different methodologies to classify securities into growth versus value style categories, which can result in different constituent compositions across style indices from different providers, even when notionally tracking the same broad market.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: D) Different index providers can use meaningfully different methodologies to classify securities into growth versus value style categories, which can result in different constituent compositions across style indices from different providers, even when notionally tracking the same broad market.

Different index providers can use varying specific methodologies and criteria (such as different combinations of price-to-book, growth rates, or other fundamental characteristics) to classify securities into growth versus value categories, which can result in meaningfully different constituent compositions and characteristics across style indices from different providers; a manager should evaluate whether a specific benchmark's construction methodology genuinely aligns with their own investment philosophy and process before adopting it for performance evaluation.

Question 19

A market-oriented equity manager typically exhibits which characteristic?

  • A) Strong growth tilt with high P/E and P/B relative to benchmark
  • B) Blend style without a consistent growth or value bias
  • C) Defensive positioning with low beta and high dividend yield
  • D) Concentrated sector bets in cyclical industries
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) Blend style without a consistent growth or value bias

Market-oriented (blend) managers have a style that is neither consistently growth nor value. They may use a mix of both, employing both types of stocks without a persistent factor tilt.

Question 20

In equity portfolio construction, the maximum diversification portfolio maximizes:

  • A) Expected return per unit of total risk (Sharpe ratio)
  • B) The ratio of the weighted average volatility of assets to portfolio volatility
  • C) The number of holdings in the portfolio
  • D) Active share relative to the benchmark
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) The ratio of the weighted average volatility of assets to portfolio volatility

The maximum diversification portfolio maximizes the 'diversification ratio' = weighted average individual volatilities / portfolio volatility. It is distinct from the minimum variance portfolio and the tangency portfolio.

Question 21

Identifying a company with a durable competitive advantage (economic moat) is most relevant for which valuation method?

  • A) Price multiples, because moats justify premium P/E ratios
  • B) Residual income and DCF models, because moats imply sustained above-cost-of-capital returns over long periods
  • C) Asset-based valuation, since moats are balance sheet characteristics
  • D) EV/EBITDA, which directly captures economic moat quality
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) Residual income and DCF models, because moats imply sustained above-cost-of-capital returns over long periods

A moat means a company can sustain ROE > cost of equity (or ROIC > WACC) for a long time before competition erodes it. This directly flows into residual income (sustained positive RI) and DCF (higher terminal value from extended competitive advantage period).

Question 22

A manager with high active share and high tracking error is best described as a:

  • A) Closet indexer
  • B) Concentrated active manager with significant factor bets
  • C) Factor tilter with systematic exposures
  • D) Market-neutral hedge fund manager
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) Concentrated active manager with significant factor bets

High active share indicates large deviations from benchmark weights (stock selection dominates). High tracking error indicates significant active risk. Combined, this profile describes a highly active, concentrated manager who makes both security selection and factor bets.

Question 23

A long-only equity manager's information ratio will be maximized when:

  • A) The portfolio maximizes absolute returns regardless of benchmark
  • B) Active risk (tracking error) is minimized by staying close to the benchmark
  • C) The active weights reflect the information coefficient in proportion to the manager's skill
  • D) The portfolio replicates the benchmark exactly
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: C) The active weights reflect the information coefficient in proportion to the manager's skill

The Fundamental Law (IR = IC × √BR) and optimal active weight theory (Grinold) suggest that active weights should be proportional to the manager's forecasted alpha signal (IC) and inversely proportional to residual risk. Maximizing IR requires aligning risk-taking with actual skill.

Question 24

An equity manager using a fundamental factor model finds that her portfolio has a significant positive exposure to the 'momentum' factor. This means the portfolio holds stocks that have:

  • A) Low P/B ratios relative to the market
  • B) Recently outperformed the market on a relative basis
  • C) High dividend yields and low payout risk
  • D) Strong earnings quality and low accruals
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) Recently outperformed the market on a relative basis

The momentum factor captures the tendency for recent winners to continue outperforming and recent losers to continue underperforming. Positive momentum exposure means the portfolio is tilted toward recent market outperformers.

Question 25

An equity manager pursuing a "market neutral" long/short strategy holds long positions in stocks expected to outperform and short positions of approximately equal dollar value in stocks expected to underperform. The primary goal of matching the dollar values is to:

  • A) Eliminate the need for any ongoing risk monitoring.
  • B) Minimize the portfolio's net exposure to overall market movements (systematic/beta risk), isolating returns primarily to the manager's stock selection skill.
  • C) Guarantee that the long positions will always outperform the short positions.
  • D) Maximize the portfolio's overall exposure to broad market direction.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) Minimize the portfolio's net exposure to overall market movements (systematic/beta risk), isolating returns primarily to the manager's stock selection skill.

By matching long and short dollar exposures (and often further refining this by matching beta-adjusted exposures), a market-neutral manager seeks to minimize the portfolio's sensitivity to overall market direction, aiming to isolate returns to the manager's ability to select relatively outperforming and underperforming securities (alpha), rather than from general market movements.

Question 26

An equity manager's "active share" measures:

  • A) The percentage of a portfolio's holdings that differ from its benchmark index's holdings, indicating the degree of active management versus benchmark-hugging.
  • B) The portfolio's total dollar value.
  • C) The number of years the manager has been actively managing money.
  • D) The portfolio's dividend yield relative to its benchmark.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: A) The percentage of a portfolio's holdings that differ from its benchmark index's holdings, indicating the degree of active management versus benchmark-hugging.

Active share quantifies the proportion of a portfolio's holdings that deviate from its benchmark index, with a higher active share indicating a more differentiated, actively managed portfolio and a lower active share suggesting the portfolio closely resembles ("hugs") its benchmark, which is relevant for evaluating whether a manager's fees are justified by genuine active management.

Question 27

A portfolio manager implementing a "growth" equity investing style typically seeks companies characterized by:

  • A) Below-average expected earnings growth and the lowest available valuation multiples.
  • B) Companies exclusively in mature, slow-growing industries.
  • C) Companies with no history of any revenue growth whatsoever.
  • D) Above-average expected earnings or revenue growth, often trading at higher valuation multiples reflecting that growth expectation.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: D) Above-average expected earnings or revenue growth, often trading at higher valuation multiples reflecting that growth expectation.

Growth investing focuses on companies expected to grow earnings or revenue faster than the broader market or their industry peers, often accepting higher valuation multiples (such as P/E) as compensation for that superior expected growth, in contrast to value investing, which emphasizes companies trading at lower valuations relative to fundamentals.

Question 28

An equity manager transitions a large legacy portfolio to a new target portfolio, seeking to minimize transaction costs and market impact during the transition. This type of specialized management is generally known as:

  • A) Contingent immunization.
  • B) Currency overlay management.
  • C) Portfolio transition management.
  • D) Passive index replication.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: C) Portfolio transition management.

Portfolio transition management specializes in efficiently restructuring a portfolio from an existing set of holdings to a new target portfolio (such as when changing managers or strategies), aiming to minimize transaction costs, market impact, and time out of the market during the transition process.

Question 29

A "smart beta" equity strategy that tilts toward stocks with lower historical volatility, aiming to capture a documented "low volatility anomaly," is generally implemented using:

  • A) A strategy that requires holding only a single stock at all times.
  • B) A rules-based, systematic screening and weighting methodology, rather than fully discretionary, subjective security selection by a portfolio manager.
  • C) Purely discretionary judgment with no systematic rules of any kind.
  • D) A methodology identical in every way to traditional market-cap-weighted indexing.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) A rules-based, systematic screening and weighting methodology, rather than fully discretionary, subjective security selection by a portfolio manager.

Smart beta strategies, including low-volatility strategies, are generally implemented using transparent, rules-based methodologies for security selection and weighting, distinguishing them from both traditional passive market-cap-weighted indexing and fully discretionary active management, while still targeting a specific factor exposure believed to be associated with excess risk-adjusted returns.

Question 30

An analyst evaluating equity manager selection considers a manager's "factor exposures" (such as value, momentum, size, and quality) as part of the due diligence process, primarily to:

  • A) Understand the underlying sources of the manager's historical returns and assess whether the manager's performance is genuinely due to skill (alpha) or largely explained by exposure to well-documented systematic risk factors.
  • B) Determine the manager's office location.
  • C) Guarantee the manager will replicate past performance exactly going forward.
  • D) Avoid any need to review the manager's actual historical performance track record.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: A) Understand the underlying sources of the manager's historical returns and assess whether the manager's performance is genuinely due to skill (alpha) or largely explained by exposure to well-documented systematic risk factors.

Factor exposure analysis helps decompose a manager's historical returns into components attributable to known systematic factors versus a residual attributable to manager-specific skill (alpha), which is important for evaluating whether a manager's fees (particularly for active management) are justified by genuine skill rather than exposure that could be captured more cheaply through a passive factor strategy.

Question 31

An actively managed equity portfolio generated an annualized active return (portfolio return minus benchmark return) of 2.4% over the past five years, with an annualized tracking error of 4.0% over the same period. The portfolio's information ratio over this period is closest to:

  • A) 0.60
  • B) 1.67
  • C) 0.24
  • D) 6.40
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: A) 0.60

The information ratio is calculated as active return divided by tracking error: 2.4% / 4.0% = 0.60. This measures the manager's active return generated per unit of active risk taken relative to the benchmark, a standard tool for comparing the risk-adjusted value added by different active managers.

Question 32

An equity portfolio manager is evaluating the use of a direct indexing approach for a taxable client, constructing a portfolio of individual stocks designed to closely track a benchmark index while retaining the flexibility to harvest tax losses at the individual security level and customize specific exclusions. Relative to investing in a conventional index mutual fund or ETF tracking the same benchmark, which of the following is a key potential advantage of direct indexing for this client?

  • A) Direct indexing eliminates all tracking error relative to the target benchmark, achieving performance that is always identical to a conventional index fund or ETF tracking the same index.
  • B) Direct indexing allows the client to realize losses on individual underperforming securities within the portfolio (tax-loss harvesting at the security level) to offset gains elsewhere, and to apply personalized exclusions or tilts, flexibility not available when holding a pooled index fund or ETF as a single security.
  • C) A conventional index mutual fund or ETF always provides superior tax-loss harvesting opportunities compared to a direct indexing approach, since fund-level losses can be passed through directly to individual unit holders.
  • D) Direct indexing is available only to institutional investors and cannot be implemented for individual private wealth clients under any circumstances.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) Direct indexing allows the client to realize losses on individual underperforming securities within the portfolio (tax-loss harvesting at the security level) to offset gains elsewhere, and to apply personalized exclusions or tilts, flexibility not available when holding a pooled index fund or ETF as a single security.

Because a direct indexing portfolio holds individual securities rather than a single pooled fund or ETF share, it allows a taxable investor to harvest tax losses at the individual security level (selling specific underperforming positions to realize losses, while maintaining overall benchmark-like exposure through the remaining and replacement holdings) and to apply personalized exclusions, tilts, or values-based screens, a degree of customization and tax-management flexibility that is not available when holding a single pooled index mutual fund or ETF position, though this comes with greater implementation complexity and some tracking error relative to the benchmark.

Question 33

A quantitative equity manager builds a multi-factor stock selection model and, in constructing the final portfolio, applies a constraint limiting the maximum active weight of any individual position to 2% relative to the benchmark, regardless of how strongly the model ranks that stock. Which of the following best describes the primary tradeoff introduced by this type of individual position constraint?

  • A) Position-level constraints have no effect whatsoever on a quantitative portfolio's realized risk or expected active return relative to an unconstrained optimization.
  • B) The constraint may prevent the portfolio from fully expressing the model's highest-conviction views (since the most attractive stocks cannot be weighted as heavily as the unconstrained optimization would prefer), potentially reducing expected active return, in exchange for limiting single-stock concentration risk and the potential impact of any individual position performing very poorly.
  • C) Position-level constraints exist solely to comply with regulatory diversification requirements and serve no risk management or portfolio construction purpose of their own.
  • D) Applying a maximum active weight constraint always increases, rather than decreases, a quantitative portfolio's expected active return relative to an unconstrained optimization.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) The constraint may prevent the portfolio from fully expressing the model's highest-conviction views (since the most attractive stocks cannot be weighted as heavily as the unconstrained optimization would prefer), potentially reducing expected active return, in exchange for limiting single-stock concentration risk and the potential impact of any individual position performing very poorly.

An individual position-level constraint, such as a maximum 2% active weight, limits single-stock concentration risk and reduces the potential impact of any one position performing very poorly, but in doing so may prevent the portfolio from fully expressing the model's highest-conviction views on its most attractive-ranked stocks, since those positions cannot be sized as large as an unconstrained optimization would otherwise prefer; this represents a tradeoff between limiting concentration risk and potentially reducing the portfolio's expected active return relative to a fully unconstrained implementation of the model's views.

Question 34

An equity manager running a long-only large-cap growth strategy benchmarked against a large-cap growth index is evaluating whether to permit a modest allocation to exchange-traded put options on the broad market index as a portfolio-level hedge during periods when the manager has a strong bearish near-term market view. Which of the following is a key consideration regarding this proposed use of index put options?

  • A) Purchasing index put options as a hedge has no effect whatsoever on the portfolio's tracking error relative to its long-only benchmark.
  • B) Using index put options introduces an additional cost (the option premium) that creates a persistent drag on returns if the bearish view does not materialize, and also introduces a source of active risk and potential tracking error relative to a long-only benchmark that does not itself use derivatives-based hedging.
  • C) Exchange-traded index put options can only be purchased by market-neutral or long-short strategies, never by long-only equity strategies.
  • D) Purchasing index put options eliminates all stock-specific risk in the portfolio while leaving broad market risk completely unaffected.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) Using index put options introduces an additional cost (the option premium) that creates a persistent drag on returns if the bearish view does not materialize, and also introduces a source of active risk and potential tracking error relative to a long-only benchmark that does not itself use derivatives-based hedging.

Purchasing index put options as a tactical hedge introduces an ongoing cost (the premium paid), which creates a return drag in periods when the anticipated market decline does not occur, and the resulting hedged position's return profile will differ from that of a long-only benchmark that does not employ derivatives-based hedging, introducing an additional source of active risk and potential tracking error that the manager and investors should understand and monitor, in addition to whatever benefit the hedge might provide during an actual market decline.

Question 35

An equity manager is evaluating the use of a multi-factor risk model to decompose a portfolio's active risk into contributions from specific factors (value, momentum, quality, size, and so on) versus stock-specific (idiosyncratic) risk. Which of the following would most likely indicate that a manager's active risk is being generated primarily through genuine security selection skill rather than unintended factor bets?

  • A) A large proportion of the portfolio's total active risk is attributable to a small number of common systematic factor exposures, with relatively little risk attributable to stock-specific sources.
  • B) A large proportion of the portfolio's total active risk is attributable to stock-specific (idiosyncratic) sources, with relatively modest, largely unintended exposure to common systematic factors.
  • C) Multi-factor risk decomposition provides no meaningful way to distinguish between factor-driven and stock-specific sources of a portfolio's active risk.
  • D) The presence of any factor exposure whatsoever in a multi-factor decomposition automatically and conclusively indicates the complete absence of genuine security selection skill.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) A large proportion of the portfolio's total active risk is attributable to stock-specific (idiosyncratic) sources, with relatively modest, largely unintended exposure to common systematic factors.

When a multi-factor risk decomposition attributes a large proportion of a portfolio's total active risk to stock-specific (idiosyncratic) sources, rather than to common systematic factor exposures, this is more consistent with active risk being generated through genuine, differentiated security selection (picking specific winners and avoiding specific losers) rather than through broad, potentially unintended factor tilts (such as an inadvertent value or size bet), which a manager may not have intended as the primary source of the portfolio's active risk and return.

Question 36

A quantitative equity manager's portfolio has an active share of 35% relative to its benchmark, while a second manager's portfolio, benchmarked against the same index, has an active share of 78%. Both portfolios have similar tracking error. Which of the following is the most likely explanation for the first manager's low active share despite similar tracking error to the second manager?

  • A) The first manager's low active share is impossible to reconcile with having tracking error similar to the second manager's; active share and tracking error must always move in the same direction for any two portfolios.
  • B) The first manager likely holds many benchmark constituents at weights similar to the benchmark (low stock-specific active share) while taking meaningful factor or sector tilts that concentrate active risk in a few systematic dimensions, generating tracking error through factor exposure rather than broad-based individual stock selection differences from the benchmark.
  • C) Active share and tracking error are, by mathematical definition, always identical measures of the same underlying concept, making this scenario a data error.
  • D) The first manager's fund must hold a larger number of individual securities than the second manager's fund in order to produce this specific combination of active share and tracking error.
Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B) The first manager likely holds many benchmark constituents at weights similar to the benchmark (low stock-specific active share) while taking meaningful factor or sector tilts that concentrate active risk in a few systematic dimensions, generating tracking error through factor exposure rather than broad-based individual stock selection differences from the benchmark.

Active share measures the percentage of portfolio holdings that differ from the benchmark's holdings and weights, while tracking error measures the volatility of active returns, which can be driven by concentrated factor, sector, or systematic risk exposures rather than broad stock-specific deviations from the benchmark; a manager can therefore exhibit relatively low active share (many holdings similar in weight to the benchmark) while still generating meaningful tracking error through a small number of concentrated factor or sector tilts, illustrating why the two measures capture different, complementary dimensions of active management style.

Want more Equity Portfolio Management practice?

Create a free account to unlock the full CFA Program Q-bank and timed mock exams — no card required.

Create free account